Canadian Machine, Tool, Die & Mould Federation Contact Us
HOME
Federation Board
Federation Committees
Canadian Association of Mold Makers
Canadian Pattern Makers Association
Canadian Plastics Industry Association
Canadian Tooling and Machining Association
Current Archives
Precisely Canadian
Services
Calendar of Events
Wage and Business Survey
2008 Questionnaire
MEMBERS Directory &
Company Profile
Federation Blog

 

Contact Us

 

 

 

NEWS


Earning SR & ED tax credits

Presenter Martin Vines explains key points of the program.

Scientific Research & Experimental Development – SR & ED – wasn’t always associated with the art of moldmaking. Today, thanks to Revenue Canada tax rebate programs, it’s a key component in many tool shops’ plans, as they look for any opportunity to improve the bottom line.

The big question is, what is research or development, and how does Revenue Canada determine that? A CMTDMF information session on this, held at Windsor’s Ciociaro Club on November 29, clarified most of the answers.
A group of Revenue Canada staff came to explain different aspects of the program Martin Vines, national technology sector specialist for plastic, outlined the main points, explaining that a lot of variables come into the picture. This is especially true because each tooling job is going to be unique.
“The ‘oops’ type of project is one of the most common that comes up,” he said, “when something that’s supposed to be routine isn’t. Your usual technologies don’t work in this particular circumstance. This accounts for the majority of the projects we see.”

In many cases, he stressed, the key phrase in assessing a claim in advance will be “It depends.” Revenue Canada can provide a provisional appraisal of a claim once the work has been done, and this can be done within two months of completion. But it doesn’t offer such appraisals in advance of work beginning, since a customer can change his mind, or a project can change direction mid-course

“We will cover unsuccessful attempts at SDR & ED,” Vines said, “and success in the project is not a criterion, as long as you clearly demonstrate you were attempting to make a technological advancement.

The moldmaker has to establish technological advance is necessary for the project in hand, either because of cost constraints, or because of the uniqueness or complexity of the job. Various items can be included for a tax rebate, including machinery or software acquired specifically for the project. Other criteria that are considered include:

  1. The mold is built only for experimentation and will not be sold.
  2. It uses a new mold material, or an insert from a more conductive material.
  3. It has special mechanisms or instrumentation on it.
  4. It’s a complex mold with many functions.
  5. The geometry of the mold is significantly different to anything done before.
  6. Part of the job is technically unique. This might be a small unique feature on an otherwise standard mould.

Documentation for all this can be compiled separately, but normal business documentation, including invoices or payroll records, can be considered. This is particularly necessary in jobs that seem conventional, but are found to turned into research projects halfway through.

“You have to demonstrate things are being used in significantly different ways to what has been used before,” Vine said. “But SR&ED can start and stop at any time in the process. It’s not the whole process, and doesn’t have to be.”
The event was attended by over 50 people from toolmaking firms, from Windsor, Toronto and points in between.

After the seminar section, there was a workshop where attendees broke into three groups to discuss a technical problem involving a high-polish mold for automotive using a new  grade of steel. People had an opportunity to look at what might qualify for a tax rebate, and what would not.

Key issues for toolmakers that came out of the session were timeliness of response to their requests for appraisals, and also the uncertainty factor. While Revenue Canada’s SR & ED staff are all technically trained, there is no guarantee they will allow all projects, or all aspects of a project that are claimed. A toolmaker might have to appeal a ruling in order to earn the rebate, and the entire process can take a period of many months before a cheque is finally issued.

In sum, SR & ED credits are not a form of instant cash. They are, though, a valuable incentive for moldmakers to venture into unexplored territory, and to take on projects that require more than the usual level of risk.
www.cra-arc.gc.ca/taxcredit/sred/

One of the workshop groups studies its SR & ED options.

 

Back to home page